Economic Hangover May Hurt Inauguration

American may not be in the mood to party

Unemployment is on the rise. The stock market is in the tank. Is America really up for a party?

For the sake of the masses expected for President-elect Barack Obama's inauguration, let's hope so. While Obama must be sensitive to the nation's time of war and recession, there still is reason to expect a rollicking time.

"We're mindful of the fact that people in this country are hurting, that they're going through hard times," said Linda Douglass, spokeswoman for the Presidential Inaugural Committee.

"On the other hand, we see this not just as a celebration of an election, but as a time for people to come together and celebrate their common values and shared aspirations and goals."

The committee has disclosed few details of the celebration, but it surely won't come cheap. President George W. Bush raised $42 million to help finance his second inauguration. Millions more were spent by the government on security.

Though costly, an inauguration helps set the tone for a presidency, said Gil Troy, a visiting scholar at the Bipartisan Policy Center who has written extensively on presidents and first ladies.

The president should not be seen noshing on caviar, but neither should he dispense with glamour entirely, Troy said. Americans want their leader to be a man of the people and a celebrity superstar, both.   "Americans are people who love to indulge, and deep in our hearts want our leaders to be like the king and queen of England -- but not too much," he said. 

President Ronald Reagan fit the bill best when he set a new standard of opulence for his 1981 inauguration, Troy said. Nancy Reagan wore a $10,000 gown to the three-hour gala with Frank Sinatra.

"Reagan had the ability -- and maybe the Obamas will -- to somehow make spending look patriotic," Troy said.

As a Democrat, it may be easier for Obama to avoid accusations of overspending; if anything, his party has a reputation for dowdiness

For the most part, inaugurations have grown more elaborate over the years. Elegant balls were added in 1809, and parades in 1873, historian Paul F. Boller Jr. wrote in White House History, the journal of the White House Historical Association.

"What subsequent presidents learned from that was just the power of celebrity," Troy said. "If you did it right you could really launch yourself and your administration into the stratosphere."

Obama's Presidential Inaugural Committee aims to "make it the most open and accessible inauguration in history," Douglass said.

Just how lavish it will be is hard to say.

Unlike in previous years, the inaugural committee said it would not accept contributions from corporations, lobbyists or foreign citizens, and would cap individual contributions at $50,000. Some of the glitziest events -- like the MTV ball -- may be privately funded.

If Obama strikes the right balance, it might just earn him political capital for his first days in office.

"It's a way of making deposits into the public bank account of goodwill by giving everybody an opportunity to celebrate," Troy
said.

Copyright The Associated Press
Contact Us