A juror involved in the homicide case that spawned the popular Netflix series "Making a Murderer" says she stands by the verdict.
The 10-part series raises questions about whether Steven Avery and his nephew Brendan Dassey were wrongly convicted, spurring new scrutiny of the case and prompting armchair sleuths to flood online message boards and flood local officials with requests for case records. The show includes comments from an excused juror in Avery's case suggesting his conviction was based on flawed evidence.
But Diane Free, a juror who was present to the end, told The Associated Press by phone that she was "comfortable with the verdict we reached. The thing on Netflix was a movie, not a documentary."
The series draws on dramatic details. Avery had been wrongly convicted of a 1985 rape and served 18 years in prison. After being freed, he had a $36 million lawsuit pending against public officials when photographer Teresa Halbach disappeared on Halloween 2005 following a visit to the Avery family salvage yard to take pictures of a minivan.
Halbach's bones and belongings were found burned near Avery's trailer. Avery and Dassey were eventually convicted and sentenced to life terms, but only Dassey is eligible for parole — in 2048.
Authorities involved in the case have called the series biased and say it omits crucial facts that led to the convictions. Filmmakers Moira Demos and Laura Ricciardi have stood by their work, which spans nearly a decade and concentrates on the defense and perspective of Avery and Dassey's relatives.
The jurors have been mostly silent. Many had made an agreement not to talk about the case after the conviction. Free declined to elaborate beyond her brief remark when reached Wednesday. "I have to ask, please don't call me again," she said before hanging up.
Local
Richard Mahler, the excused juror, said Thursday that he still has questions about the investigation into Avery's involvement. Mahler sat through weeks of testimony and deliberated with the panel for four hours before he asked to leave because he was feeling emotionally exhausted, he said. He also said he felt threatened by another juror.
Mahler said seven jurors, including him, voted not guilty in the first vote. Three voted guilty and two were undecided, he said. Mahler said he doesn't know what happened after that because he left.
"I don't know what the tensions were in the jury room, we were all pretty mentally tired of everything," he said.
The series' two filmmakers, Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos, said on NBC's "Today" Tuesday that a juror from the trial reached out to them saying he or she believes Avery was not proven guilty in his trial. The juror, who voted to convict Avery, only did so out of fear for his/her personal safety, Demos said.
The juror who contacted the documentary's filmmakers also said that the verdict reached in Avery's trial was a "compromise."
The two filmmakers have not yet contacted other jurors to independently verify this revelation, they said. NBC News has not independently verified this claim with any jurors.
With the series becoming a phenomenon, the custodian of the court records from the case has been inundated with inquiries from local residents and people around the world who want to see the transcripts, exhibits and other documents.
The chief clerk at the Manitowoc County Clerk of Courts office, Lynn Zigmunt, says there are more than six bankers boxes of material. The requests began picking up about a week ago, she said, and she's assigned an employee to handle the requests each day.
"It's a lot of information, a lot of documents, so we have to just be careful — but that's our job as custodians of the records," Zigmunt told WBAY-TV.
